Chapter 14 Higher-order regression analyses

14.1 Example data set

## Parsed with column specification:
## cols(
##   VA = col_double(),
##   IM = col_double(),
##   EM = col_double()
## )

A data set on “motive congruence”.

A dataset containing the explicit intimacy motive, implicit affiliation/intimacy motive and self ratings of affective valence. The variables are as follows:

  • EM: Explicit intimacy motive, measured with a questionnaire adapted from the Unified Motive Scales, (Schönbrodt & Gerstenberg, 2012). Raw values have been \(z\) standardized.

  • IM: Implicit affiliation/intimacy motive, measured a with picture story exercise (6 pictures). Raw motive scores have been controlled for word count and \(z\) standardized.

  • VA: \(z\) standardized valence rating. Consists of two bipolar items from the PANAVA questionnaire (Schallberger, 2005): “zufrieden … unzufrieden” (satisfied … unsatisfied) and “ungluecklich … gluecklich” (unhappy … happy).

Each of the 362 rows is an individual participant.

14.2 Description

For the continuous tables, we present descriptive statistics.

  EM IM VA
Mean 0.00 0.00 0.00
Std.Dev 1.00 1.00 1.00
Min -3.57 -1.98 -3.04
Median 0.20 -0.14 0.26
Max 2.65 5.54 1.49
N.Valid 362.00 362.00 362.00
Pct.Valid 100.00 100.00 100.00

14.3 Visualization

Relationships between key variables.

Figure 14.1: Relationships between key variables.

14.4 Regression analysis

Model statistics
Multiple \(R^2\) 0.050
Multiple \(R^2_{adj}\) 0.037
\(F_{5,356}\) 3.755
Sig. (\(p\)) 0.003
Resid. SD 0.981
Resid. df 356
Regression coefficients
Coef. Std. Err. \(t\) stat. Sig. (\(p\)) VIF
(Intercept) 0.099 0.066 1.490 0.137
EM −0.036 0.056 −0.643 0.521 1.159
IM 0.106 0.061 1.742 0.082 1.398
EMsqr −0.089 0.033 −2.655 0.008 1.154
IMsqr −0.014 0.025 −0.558 0.577 1.485
EM:IM 0.146 0.051 2.874 0.004 1.077

14.4.1 Model checking

References

Schallberger, U. (2005). Kurzskala zur erfassung der positiven aktivierung, negativen aktivierungund valenz in experience sampling studien (panava-ks) [short scales for the assessment of positive affect, negative affect, and valence in experience sampling studies]. Retrieved from University of Zürich website: http://www.psychologie.uzh.ch/institut/angehoerige/emeriti/schallberger/schallberger-pub/PANAVA_05.pdf

Schönbrodt, F. D., & Gerstenberg, F. X. R. (2012). An IRT analysis of motive questionnaires: The unified motive scales. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 725–742. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656612001353